Recalling Events of the Parks Commission
In reviewing information from the Parks Commission involvement with the Dunkley project, it seems that they were re-writing their mission statement in late 2004 and into 2005. At first, their mission statement with dual purpose was not accepted by Council. Rejected was their statement:”The Parks Commission creates, develops and preserves the Parks and open spaces providing safe, diverse recreational experiences that enhance the quality of life in the community today and for future generations. The Parks Commission oversees the caretaking and expansion of Lakeview Cemetery.”
After this, George Saas, hired by the City to help numerous commissions to create such a statement, came to the Parks Commission to assist their rewrite. In the midst of these discussions, came the important February 8, 2005 Parks Commission Regular Meeting, where an article from the Tribune regarding the Black River development area, was on the agenda.
Robin Abshire stated that she had asked the City Council to do a ten year study on the Harbor. The Parks Commissioners stated that they too felt a ten year study on the parks should be done in connection with development. They held to they position that public lands should stay in public hands in connection with the Black River riverfront properties owned by the City, ie. the People.
The Parks Commission even made a motion, and carried it, to request the City Council approve the Parks Commission to conduct a ten year study in conjunction with the propsed Harbor Commission study for a recreational land use plan for the community of South Haven. (from Minutes).
The Parks Commission, like all commissions in the City, stand in advisory roles in relation to Council. To be recognized by the Council and the community at large, is a real “weakness” for the commission, as George Saas identified in his analysis, yet with all the development and the lack of awareness by the community of the “real costs” of development, the Parks Commission is vital to keep the information channels open, beyond a Council that consistently votes for development.
The revised mission statement which resulted from this sequence of events was this: “The Parks Commission has a dual mission. It identifies, develops and preserves the parks system and open spaces, providing safe, diverse recreational experiences that enhance the quality of life in the community today, and for future generations; and it oversees the caretaking and expansion needs of Lakeview Cemetery.” Noticeably absent from their original mission statement was the word “creates” Parks (see first paragraph of this post).
At the next Council meeting the request for a ten year study in conjunction with the Harbor Commission to explore recreational land use and a plan for the community, went into a vote. After much discussion it was evident that there was a lack of support so no further steps could be taken.
The Parks Commission has meticulously researched and discussed the 2004 Municipal Plan, identifying many sections as important to their task. Chapter 4 (introduction, page 57, Natural Resource Trends and Conditions), p. 66 (Wetlands), p.70 (Floodplains), p.92 (Small Town Character), p.96, Quality of Life,p.135 (Area 16, Policy 27), p.136 (policy 29). Key points in Chapter Seven Future Land Use are p. 140-41 (Planning and Design Principles), p. 141 (Protection of Public Health and Safety), (Conservationtion of Sensitive Natural Resources), p. 147 (Conservation Areas), p.148 (Waterfront and Related Commercial/Recreation), p. 153 (Planning Area 4 and Area 5).
As an reviewer of this recall of events, I would add that a major study on the benefits of ecotourism needs to be done by the Commission and the City. This information would clearly stand on its own, with huge sums of monies shown to be made from it in relation to the persistent tax dollar benefit given by those who want more density of development by residential and commercial efforts. I refer you to the blog entry on August 21, where the EPA figure states that ecotourism generates $59 billion a year. I would also like to ask that if the Parks Commission cannot “create” Parks as their amended Mission Statement said, who does create them or even have the possibility of doing so. I welcome comments and answers.











Today we continue a tour around Reed City’s Rambadt Park, which as noted in yesterday’s post, has trees, benches, gardens, trellises, and swings given by individuals and groups to honor members of the greater community. On the left is the garden which the Telephone Company created in memory of their loyal employers and their service.






